ABSTRACT
Introduction: During armed conflicts dialysis patients may experience limitations or interruptions of therapy leading to severe life-threatening complications due to medical and logistical challenges. Before the Russian-Ukrainian war, there were approximately 10,000 adults requiring dialysis in Ukraine. Some patients decided to flee their place of residence and look for opportunities to continue dialysis in another location in Ukraine or abroad. To better understand the needs of conflict-affected kidney failure patients and to provide data which could support equitable and evidence-based prioritization of resources, the Renal Disaster Relief Task Force of the European Renal Association conducted a survey on distribution, preparedness and management of adults requiring dialysis displaced due to the war in Ukraine. Method(s): Cross-sectional online survey was conducted to assess the status of dialysis patients who were displaced across European countries since the beginning of the conflict in February 2022. The survey was sent to all national nephrology societies across Europe with a request to disseminate it to all dialysis centers in their countries. Data were collected between May and August 2022. Fresenius Medical Care (FMC) shared a limited set of aggregated data without direct center participation. Result(s): We received data on 602 patients (290 collected through the survey and 312 from FMC), who were dialyzed in 24 countries. Most patients were dialyzed in Poland (45.0%), followed by Slovakia (18.1%), Czech Republic (7.8%), Romania (6.3%), Germany (4.7%) and Hungary (3.5%). Most patients were originally dialyzed in Kyiv (north-central), Kharkiv (northeast), Odesa (southwest) and Zaporizhzhia (southeast). Before reaching the current reporting center, 34.6% of patients were treated in at least one other center since leaving their regular unit. Mean age was 48.1+/-13.4 years, 43.5% were females. Before patients left Ukraine, 95.7% had been on hemodialysis (HD), 2.5% on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 1.8% on automated PD. HD session frequency was reduced under war conditions in 23.5% of patients. Eighty-eight percent of HD patients had a patent arteriovenous fistula, 7.3% were HBs antigen positive, 16.1% had anti-HCV antibodies, 0.6% anti-HIV antibodies and 27.3% anti-HBc antibodies. In terms of patient preparedness for displacement, 63.9% carried medical records with them, 63.3% had a list of medications, 60.4% had medications themselves and 44.0% had a dialysis prescription. Overall, 26.1% of patients were admitted to the dialysis unit in the possession of all these factors while 16.1% presented with none. After leaving Ukraine, 33.9% of patients were hospitalized. Of the 88.5% of patients tested in the reporting center for COVID-19 1.9% was positive. Communication and language problems were reported by 43.8% of responding physicians. Conclusion(s): Up to the end of August 2022, less than 10% of Ukrainian dialysis patients decided to flee their country since the start of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and the majority of them chose as their place for dialysis a country neighboring Ukraine. Preparedness for displacement varied and was incomplete in most patients. Results from our survey may inform evidence-based policies and interventions to prepare for and respond to special needs of vulnerable kidney failure populations during armed conflicts and other emergencies. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is one of the greatest challenges facing healthcare systems worldwide in recent years. Burnout was found to be an important factor in the professional landscape of nephrology already prior to the COVID-19 outbreak and is expected to worsen during the pandemic due to increased workload and changes in the work environment. As a life-saving procedure, haemodialysis (HD) delivery could not undergo profound organizational adjustments, what was the case of out-patient settings, which largely turned towards telemedicine services. Poor COVID-19 outcomes of maintenance HD patients with mortality rate exceeding 20% may be also considered among personnel's aggravating factors. The aim of our study was to assess pandemic experiences, perceptions and burnout among Polish dialysis unit professionals in the COVID-19 era. METHOD: A web-based survey was distributed via e-mail to Polish dialysis units and was shared via social media channels gathering nephrology professionals, the survey was open between the 1 September 2021 and the 31 December 2021. The study survey consisted of two validated questionnaires-Pandemic Experiences and Perceptions Survey and Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel, as well as self-created questions about experiences with SARSCoV-2 infection. The study group comprised 215 nurses (208 F, 5 M, median age 50 years, IQR 10), 148 physicians (77 F, 70 M, mean age) and 16 respondents of other medical professions. 35.3% of the study group confirmed that they suffered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: According to 40% of nurses and 43.9% of physicians, the pandemic largely affected the work of dialysis units, 19% of nurses and 12% of physicians stated that it completely dominated the work. A total of 54.8% of nurses and 52.7% of physicians agreed that personal protective equipment was completely or mostly adequate. Information about safety procedures received from the dialysis unit management staff was evaluated as adequate by 53.5% of nurses and 59.5% of physicians. A total of 8.8% and 54.4% of nurses perceived life-threatening and serious risk at work during the pandemic, respectively;similar risk ratios were reported by physicians (9.45% and 55.4%, respectively). Importantly, 58.6% of nurses and 54.4% of physicians stated that their work is associated with at least serious risk for their family members. A total of 44.2% of nurses and 49.2% of physicians confirmed that they feel burned out. Out of these, 85.7% of nurses and 76.2% of physicians stated that the feeling of burnout was aggravated during the pandemic. Emotional exhaustion did not differ between nurses and physicians, while depersonalization was significantly lower (P = 0.0001) and the feeling of personal accomplishments was significantly higher (P = 0.035) among nurses than physicians. The level of burnout in three dimensions perceived by dialysis nurses and physicians during the COVID-19 is provided in Table 1. Burnout was lower among those who assessed their personal protection equipment as adequate. Also, participants who felt that the training, equipment and support provided them with a good control over their contact with the virus were found to be less burned out. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has largely affected work in dialysis units, contributing to an increased risk of work-related psychological distress and burnout in this vulnerable population of healthcare professionals. Providing proper training, equipment and support during these unprecedented times of the COVID-19 outbreak may decrease burnout among dialysis nurses and physicians.